1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 Renault Grand Espace
To start off, 2003 Renault Grand Espace is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,187 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Grand Espace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Grand Espace (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Grand Espace should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Grand Espace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 2003 Renault Grand Espace | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | 12 M | Grand Espace |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2187 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
