1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Audi TT
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (148 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 2004 Audi TT | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | 12 M | TT |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1780 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2430 mm |
