1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 12 M | Tundra |
Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |