1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy (99 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2004 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | 12 M | Caddy |
Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2520 mm |