1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2006 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | 12 M | LR3 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |