1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | 12 M | 3 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2650 mm |
