1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2006 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | 12 M | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2261 cc |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
