1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2008 Skoda Roomster
To start off, 2008 Skoda Roomster is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,422 cc (3 cylinders), 2008 Skoda Roomster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Skoda Roomster (50 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Skoda Roomster should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Skoda Roomster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 2008 Skoda Roomster | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | 12 M | Roomster |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1610 mm |
