1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | 12 M | HHR |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4475 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1603 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2629 mm |
