1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,332 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | 12 M | Colt |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |