1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2011 Mazda 5
To start off, 2011 Mazda 5 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 5 (113 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2011 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | 5 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4585 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1615 mm |