1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2011 Renault Logan
To start off, 2011 Renault Logan is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Logan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Logan (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Logan should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Logan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2011 Renault Logan | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | 12 M | Logan |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2910 mm |