1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | 12 M | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |
