1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (380 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 343 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | 12 M | XJ |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 380 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1456 mm |
