1954 Ford Crestline vs. 1979 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1979 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,910 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Crestline weights approximately 520 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford Crestline | 1979 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Crestline | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3910 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2480 mm |