1954 Ford Crestline vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1982 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,910 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Crestline weights approximately 780 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1954 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Crestline | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
| Model | Crestline | Polo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3910 cc | 1043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2340 mm |
