1954 Ford Crestline vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,910 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford Crestline | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Crestline | TL |
Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3910 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1786 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2840 mm |