1954 Ford Crestline vs. 2000 Saturn LW
To start off, 2000 Saturn LW is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,910 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Crestline weights approximately 2 kg more than 2000 Saturn LW.
Because 1954 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Saturn LW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford Crestline | 2000 Saturn LW | |
Make | Ford | Saturn |
Model | Crestline | LW |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3910 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2710 mm |