1954 Ford Crestline vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,910 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Crestline weights approximately 191 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Because 1954 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford Crestline | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Crestline | Arosa |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3910 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1289 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2850 mm |