1954 Ford Crestline vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,910 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Crestline weights approximately 420 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 1954 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford Crestline | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Crestline | Clio |
Year Released | 1954 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3910 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2690 mm |