1954 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,910 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Crestline weights approximately 505 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Crestline | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Crestline | Equator |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3910 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 152 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3200 mm |
