1954 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 Volvo V50 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,910 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo V50 weights approximately 118 kg more than 1954 Ford Crestline.
Because 1954 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford Crestline | 2009 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Crestline | V50 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3910 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2650 mm |