1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1969 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1969 ZAZ 966 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1969 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1969 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 838 kg more than 1969 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Thunderbird | 1969 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Ford | ZAZ |
| Model | Thunderbird | 966 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5114 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 72.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2170 mm |
