1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1976 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1976 Lotus Eclat is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 528 kg more than 1976 Lotus Eclat.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Thunderbird | 1976 Lotus Eclat | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Thunderbird | Eclat |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5114 cc | 1973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |
