1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 628 kg more than 1954 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Thunderbird | 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Thunderbird | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5114 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 2206 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3050 mm |
