1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1982 Mini MK IV
To start off, 1982 Mini MK IV is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1982 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1982 Mini MK IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 966 kg more than 1982 Mini MK IV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Thunderbird | 1982 Mini MK IV | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | Thunderbird | MK IV |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5114 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 612 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2040 mm |
