1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1983 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 488 kg more than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford Thunderbird | 1983 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1954 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5114 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2620 mm |