1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1989 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1989 Ford RS 200 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford RS 200 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 396 kg more than 1989 Ford RS 200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford Thunderbird | 1989 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Thunderbird | RS 200 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5114 cc | 1804 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 77.7 mm |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 229 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2410 mm |