1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1990 Volvo 960
To start off, 1990 Volvo 960 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1990 Volvo 960. (120 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1990 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 28 kg more than 1990 Volvo 960. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Thunderbird | 1990 Volvo 960 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Thunderbird | 960 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5114 cc | 2383 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2780 mm |
