1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1997 Ford Royale
To start off, 1997 Ford Royale is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1997 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Royale.
Because 1954 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford Thunderbird | 1997 Ford Royale | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Thunderbird | Royale |
Year Released | 1954 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5114 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2560 mm |