1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1998 Rover 420
To start off, 1998 Rover 420 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 389 kg more than 1998 Rover 420. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 420, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Thunderbird | 1998 Rover 420 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Thunderbird | 420 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5114 cc | 1992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 194 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1189 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2750 mm |
