1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2002 BMW X5 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW X5 (329 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW X5 weights approximately 602 kg more than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Ford | BMW |
| Model | Thunderbird | X5 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5114 cc | 4619 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 329 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2830 mm |
