1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 7 kg more than 2002 Volvo S60.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Thunderbird | S60 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5114 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 93.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1571 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2760 mm |
