1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2004 BMW 320
To start off, 2004 BMW 320 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2004 BMW 320. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 320 weights approximately 102 kg more than 1954 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford Thunderbird | 2004 BMW 320 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | Thunderbird | 320 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5114 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 17.0:1 |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 211 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2730 mm |