1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S60. (207 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S60 weights approximately 52 kg more than 1954 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2006 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Thunderbird | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Thunderbird | S60 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5114 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2720 mm |
