1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2011 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2011 Suzuki Kizashi. (185 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2011 Suzuki Kizashi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 108 kg more than 2011 Suzuki Kizashi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford Thunderbird | 2011 Suzuki Kizashi | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Thunderbird | Kizashi |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5114 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1821 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |
