1954 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C70 weights approximately 162 kg more than 1954 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1954 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Thunderbird | C70 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5114 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1836 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2639 mm |