1954 GAZ M-20 vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 GAZ M-20 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 525 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1954 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 GAZ M-20 | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | GAZ | Renault |
| Model | M-20 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2770 mm |
