1954 GAZ M-20 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1954 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1954 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 320 kg more than 1954 GAZ M-20. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1954 GAZ M-20 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | GAZ | Toyota |
Model | M-20 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 298 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3270 mm |