1954 GAZ M-20 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1954 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 GAZ M-20 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | GAZ | Mazda |
Model | M-20 | 3 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |