1954 GAZ M-20 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 306 more horse power than 1954 GAZ M-20. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1954 GAZ M-20.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 GAZ M-20 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | GAZ | Holden |
| Model | M-20 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 2120 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
