1954 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1960 Lotus Seven is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Hudson Metropolitan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Hudson Metropolitan (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (36 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Hudson Metropolitan should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Hudson Metropolitan weights approximately 375 kg more than 1960 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Hudson Metropolitan | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Hudson | Lotus |
| Model | Metropolitan | Seven |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 36 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2240 mm |
