1954 Humber Hawk vs. 1966 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1966 Lotus Seven is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Humber Hawk (70 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Humber Hawk should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Humber Hawk weights approximately 928 kg more than 1966 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Humber Hawk | 1966 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Humber | Lotus |
| Model | Hawk | Seven |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2265 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 432 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 29 L |
