1954 Humber Hawk vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 200 kg more than 1954 Humber Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mazda Sentia has automatic transmission and 1954 Humber Hawk has manual transmission. 1954 Humber Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Sentia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Humber Hawk | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
Make | Humber | Mazda |
Model | Hawk | Sentia |
Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2265 cc | 2952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |