1954 Humber Hawk vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 70 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Humber Hawk weights approximately 616 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Humber Hawk (162 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1954 Humber Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Humber Hawk | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Humber | MCC |
| Model | Hawk | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2265 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 1810 mm |
