1954 Humber Hawk vs. 2012 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2012 Toyota Highlander is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Highlander (280 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1954 Humber Hawk. (70 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1954 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 800 kg more than 1954 Humber Hawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Humber Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Humber Hawk | 2012 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Humber | Toyota |
Model | Hawk | Highlander |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2265 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4796 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 65 L |