1954 Humber Hawk vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Hawk would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Humber Hawk weights approximately 20 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 1954 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Humber Hawk (162 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1954 Humber Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Humber Hawk | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Humber | Mini |
Model | Hawk | Countryman |
Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 47 L |