1954 Humber Hawk vs. 2013 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1954 Humber Hawk. (70 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1954 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 235 kg more than 1954 Humber Hawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (281 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Humber Hawk. (162 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Humber Hawk. 2013 Volkswagen Eos has automatic transmission and 1954 Humber Hawk has manual transmission. 1954 Humber Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volkswagen Eos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Humber Hawk | 2013 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Humber | Volkswagen |
| Model | Hawk | Eos |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2265 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1595 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1791 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1443 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2578 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |
