1954 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,136 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 564 kg more than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1954 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Humber Super Snipe | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Humber | Oldsmobile |
Model | Super Snipe | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1954 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4136 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2680 mm |