1954 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2000 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2000 Toyota Crown is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,136 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 670 kg more than 2000 Toyota Crown.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Humber Super Snipe | 2000 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Humber | Toyota |
Model | Super Snipe | Crown |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4136 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1770 mm |